Export limit exceeded: 23402 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (23402 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1784 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-06-11 | 8.8 High |
| The Route OpenShift resource allows to define routes to make pods reachable at a subdomain through HAProxy. It was found that the checks performed on the spec.path YAML stanza in a Route document was insufficient and could allow a controlled injection of the HAProxy configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11884 | 1 Redhat | 3 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux, Redhat Directory Server | 2026-06-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. When serializing objectclass definitions, the oc_superior (SUP) field length is omitted from buffer size calculations in read_schema_dse() and schema_oc_to_string(), but the field is still written via strcat(). An attacker with Directory Manager privileges, or a compromised replication supplier, can trigger a server crash by creating objectclasses with long SUP values. This is an incomplete fix variant of CVE-2025-14905. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4878 | 2 Libcap Project, Redhat | 17 Libcap, Ai Inference Server, Discovery and 14 more | 2026-06-11 | 6.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libcap. A local unprivileged user can exploit a Time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the `cap_set_file()` function. This allows an attacker with write access to a parent directory to redirect file capability updates to an attacker-controlled file. By doing so, capabilities can be injected into or stripped from unintended executables, leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4874 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-06-10 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated attacker can perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by manipulating the `client_session_host` parameter during refresh token requests. This occurs when a Keycloak client is configured to use the `backchannel.logout.url` with the `application.session.host` placeholder. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to make HTTP requests from the Keycloak server’s network context, potentially probing internal networks or internal APIs, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-37977 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote attacker can exploit a Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) header injection vulnerability in Keycloak's User-Managed Access (UMA) token endpoint. This flaw occurs because the `azp` claim from a client-supplied JSON Web Token (JWT) is used to set the `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` header before the JWT signature is validated. When a specially crafted JWT with an attacker-controlled `azp` value is processed, this value is reflected as the CORS origin, even if the grant is later rejected. This can lead to the exposure of low-sensitivity information from authorization server error responses, weakening origin isolation, but only when a target client is misconfigured with `webOrigins: ["*"]`. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9088 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 2.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in org.keycloak.services. An administrator with delegated access to read group memberships and users can bypass user profile permissions by accessing the group members endpoint. This allows the administrator to view user attributes that are explicitly configured to be denied, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8922 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. When both realm-level and client-level `notBefore` revocation policies are configured, Keycloak's OpenID Connect (OIDC) Introspection feature fails to properly honor the realm-level policy. This allows tokens that should have been revoked to remain active, potentially leading to unauthorized access or continued session validity. This could impact the security of systems utilizing Keycloak for identity and access management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8830 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user can bypass configured WebAuthn policies during credential registration by manipulating client-side JavaScript. This occurs because the server-side processAction() fails to validate that the newly created credential's parameters, such as public key algorithms, match the realm's configured WebAuthn policies. This could lead to the creation of credentials that do not adhere to administrative security requirements, potentially weakening the overall security posture of the system by allowing non-compliant authentication methods. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7500 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| When Keycloak is started with `--features-disabled=account,account-api`, the Account REST API is only partially disabled. Five endpoints under the versioned path `/account/v1alpha1` remain fully functional — including both read and write operations — because they lack the `checkAccountApiEnabled()` gate that correctly blocks four other endpoints in the same REST service class. The user needs to have permissions to use the API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9803 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak's ClientRegistrationAuth component. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted POST request with a malformed 'Authorization: Bearer' header to any client registration endpoint. This can lead to an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException, causing the server to return an HTTP 500 error and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the affected service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9802 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. When revokeRefreshToken=true is enabled and persistent session storage is in use, a server restart can reset internal timing mechanisms. This allows a remote attacker, who has previously captured a user's refresh token, to replay that token even after it has been revoked. Successful exploitation grants the attacker unauthorized access to the victim's account, potentially leading to information disclosure or privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9801 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote attacker with high privileges, such as a realm administrator configuring a malicious Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server or an attacker compromising an upstream LDAP server, could exploit this vulnerability. By sending a malformed LDAP password policy response during a password authentication request, the attacker can trigger an OutOfMemoryError. This causes the Keycloak Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to terminate, leading to a denial of service (DoS) for all realms on the affected node. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9794 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted SOAP requests to the SAML ECP (Security Assertion Markup Language Enhanced Client or Proxy) endpoint with varying client IDs. By observing distinct faultstrings in the responses, the attacker can determine the client's protocol type, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9792 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak's Client Policies, specifically within the `org.keycloak.protocol.oidc` component. When certain condition providers (client-type, client-roles, client-attributes, client-scopes) are used to enforce security restrictions, the `reject-ropc-grant` executor is silently bypassed. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain tokens via a Resource Owner Password Credentials (ROPC) grant, even when a policy is explicitly configured to block it. This bypass can lead to unauthorized access and information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9791 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user with existing organization membership can exploit this flaw by accessing user-facing APIs, such as the account API or by requesting an OpenID Connect (OIDC) token with the 'organization' scope. This allows organization metadata to be disclosed in tokens, even after an administrator has explicitly disabled the Organizations feature, potentially leading to incorrect authorization decisions by resource servers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9704 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability by sending an oversized subject_token JSON Web Token (JWT) to the TokenEndpoint. When the token exceeds a 4000-character limit, it is silently dropped, causing the system to fall back to client credentials. This allows the user to gain the permissions of the client's service account, leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9087 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-06-10 | 6.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. The cross-session verification proof is keyed only by (local userId, idpAlias) and is not bound to the upstream identity that was actually verified, so a second upstream account on the same IdP can consume it and get linked to the victim's local account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28369 | 1 Redhat | 17 Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot and 14 more | 2026-06-10 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. When Undertow receives an HTTP request where the first header line starts with one or more spaces, it incorrectly processes the request by stripping these leading spaces. This behavior, which violates HTTP standards, can be exploited by a remote attacker to perform request smuggling. Request smuggling allows an attacker to bypass security mechanisms, access restricted information, or manipulate web caches, potentially leading to unauthorized actions or data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28368 | 1 Redhat | 17 Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot and 14 more | 2026-06-10 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to construct specially crafted requests where header names are parsed differently by Undertow compared to upstream proxies. This discrepancy in header interpretation can be exploited to launch request smuggling attacks, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing unauthorized resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28367 | 1 Redhat | 17 Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot and 14 more | 2026-06-10 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending `\r\r\r` as a header block terminator. This can be used for request smuggling with certain proxy servers, such as older versions of Apache Traffic Server and Google Cloud Classic Application Load Balancer, potentially leading to unauthorized access or manipulation of web requests. | ||||