{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.2", "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2026-46620", "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "state": "PUBLISHED", "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M", "dateReserved": "2026-05-15T19:34:14.012Z", "datePublished": "2026-05-26T15:04:32.092Z", "dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T16:04:41.864Z"}, "containers": {"cna": {"title": "e107: CSRF in comment.php moderation endpoints via token-optional validation in session_handler::check()", "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"cweId": "CWE-285", "lang": "en", "description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization", "type": "CWE"}]}, {"descriptions": [{"cweId": "CWE-352", "lang": "en", "description": "CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)", "type": "CWE"}]}], "metrics": [{"cvssV3_1": {"attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "version": "3.1"}}], "references": [{"name": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5", "tags": ["x_refsource_CONFIRM"], "url": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5"}], "affected": [{"vendor": "e107inc", "product": "e107", "versions": [{"version": "< 2.3.5", "status": "affected"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "shortName": "GitHub_M", "dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T15:04:32.092Z"}, "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.5, e107 CMS does not properly enforce CSRF token validation on comment moderation actions. The problem comes down to how session_handler::check() handles CSRF tokens. Instead of requiring a token on every state-changing request, it only validates the token if one happens to be present. If there is no token at all, the check is skipped entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.5."}], "source": {"advisory": "GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5", "discovery": "UNKNOWN"}}, "adp": [{"references": [{"url": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5", "tags": ["exploit"]}], "metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"timestamp": "2026-05-27T16:04:28.086263Z", "id": "CVE-2026-46620", "options": [{"Exploitation": "poc"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "partial"}], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "version": "2.0.3"}}}], "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T16:04:41.864Z"}}]}}

{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "containers": {"cna": {"title": "e107: CSRF in comment.php moderation endpoints via token-optional validation in session_handler::check()", "source": {"advisory": "GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5", "discovery": "UNKNOWN"}, "metrics": [{"cvssV3_1": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 6.5, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE"}}], "affected": [{"vendor": "e107inc", "product": "e107", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "< 2.3.5"}]}], "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5", "name": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5", "tags": ["x_refsource_CONFIRM"]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.5, e107 CMS does not properly enforce CSRF token validation on comment moderation actions. The problem comes down to how session_handler::check() handles CSRF tokens. Instead of requiring a token on every state-changing request, it only validates the token if one happens to be present. If there is no token at all, the check is skipped entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.5."}], "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "type": "CWE", "cweId": "CWE-285", "description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization"}]}, {"descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "type": "CWE", "cweId": "CWE-352", "description": "CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "shortName": "GitHub_M", "dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T15:04:32.092Z"}}, "adp": [{"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"id": "CVE-2026-46620", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "options": [{"Exploitation": "poc"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "partial"}], "version": "2.0.3", "timestamp": "2026-05-27T16:04:28.086263Z"}}}], "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5", "tags": ["exploit"]}], "providerMetadata": {"shortName": "CISA-ADP", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T16:04:38.565Z"}}]}, "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2026-46620", "state": "PUBLISHED", "dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T15:04:32.092Z", "dateReserved": "2026-05-15T19:34:14.012Z", "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "datePublished": "2026-05-26T15:04:32.092Z", "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M"}, "dataVersion": "5.2"}

{"cveTags": [], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.5, e107 CMS does not properly enforce CSRF token validation on comment moderation actions. The problem comes down to how session_handler::check() handles CSRF tokens. Instead of requiring a token on every state-changing request, it only validates the token if one happens to be present. If there is no token at all, the check is skipped entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.5."}], "id": "CVE-2026-46620", "lastModified": "2026-05-27T17:16:40.590", "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"cvssData": {"attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "version": "3.1"}, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "security-advisories@github.com", "type": "Secondary"}]}, "published": "2026-05-26T16:16:26.130", "references": [{"source": "security-advisories@github.com", "url": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5"}, {"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "url": "https://github.com/e107inc/e107/security/advisories/GHSA-m4hh-m278-jwg5"}], "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com", "vulnStatus": "Deferred", "weaknesses": [{"description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-285"}, {"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-352"}], "source": "security-advisories@github.com", "type": "Secondary"}]}

{}

{"affected": [{"configurations": [{"platform": null, "status": "affected", "versions": {"scheme": "semver", "value": "[0,2.3.5)"}}], "enrichment": {"confidence": 95.0, "confidence_source": "inferred", "scores": [{"score": 95.0, "source": "inferred"}, {"score": 100.0, "source": "matching"}]}, "original": {"product": "e107", "source": "cna", "vendor": "e107inc"}, "product": "e107", "vendor": "e107"}], "created": "2026-05-26T16:30:10.044679+00:00", "updated": "2026-05-26T17:30:10.600856+00:00", "vendors": ["e107", "e107$PRODUCT$e107"]}