Search Results (1434 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-47258 2026-04-15 8.1 High
2N Access Commander version 2.1 and prior is vulnerable in default settings to Man In The Middle attack due to not verifying certificates of 2N edge devices. 2N has currently released an updated version 3.3 of 2N Access Commander, with added Certificate Fingerprint Verification. Since version 2.2 of 2N Access Commander (released in February 2022) it is also possible to enforce TLS certificate validation.It is recommended that all customers update 2N Access Commander to the latest version and use one of two mentioned practices.
CVE-2025-65753 1 Gryphon 1 Guardian Gryphon 2026-04-15 7.5 High
An issue in the TLS certification mechanism of Guardian Gryphon v01.06.0006.22 allows attackers to execute commands as root.
CVE-2025-48393 1 Eaton 1 G4 Pdu 2026-04-15 5.7 Medium
The server identity check mechanism for firmware upgrade performed via command shell is insecurely implemented potentially allowing an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-middle attack. This security issue has been fixed in the latest firmware version of Eaton G4 PDU which is available on the Eaton download center.
CVE-2024-31340 2026-04-15 4.8 Medium
TP-Link Tether versions prior to 4.5.13 and TP-Link Tapo versions prior to 3.3.6 do not properly validate certificates, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication via a man-in-the-middle attack.
CVE-2024-42186 2026-04-15 2.8 Low
BigFix Patch Download Plug-ins are affected by an insecure protocol support. The application can allow improper handling of SSL certificates validation.
CVE-2024-41724 2026-04-15 8.7 High
Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in the Gallagher Command Centre SALTO integration allowed an attacker to spoof the SALTO server. This issue affects all versions of Gallagher Command Centre prior to 9.20.1043.
CVE-2025-70043 1 Ayms 1 Node-to 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in Ayms node-To master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in TLS socket options
CVE-2025-53869 1 Brother 1 Multiple Mfps 2026-04-15 3.7 Low
Multiple MFPs provided by Brother Industries, Ltd. does not properly validate server certificates, which may allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to replace the set of root certificates used by the product with a set of arbitrary certificates.
CVE-2024-48460 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
An issue in Eugeny Tabby 1.0.213 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the server and sends the SSH username and password even when the host key verification fails.
CVE-2024-22030 1 Suse 1 Rancher 2026-04-15 8 High
A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher that can be exploited in narrow circumstances through a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. An attacker would need to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL.
CVE-2024-53846 1 Erlang 1 Otp 2026-04-15 5.5 Medium
OTP is a set of Erlang libraries, which consists of the Erlang runtime system, a number of ready-to-use components mainly written in Erlang, and a set of design principles for Erlang programs. A regression was introduced into the ssl application of OTP starting at OTP-25.3.2.8, OTP-26.2, and OTP-27.0, resulting in a server or client verifying the peer when incorrect extended key usage is presented (i.e., a server will verify a client if they have server auth ext key usage and vice versa).
CVE-2024-12797 1 Redhat 5 Discovery, Enterprise Linux, Logging and 2 more 2026-04-15 6.3 Medium
Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode is set. Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not detected by clients. RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys, by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER. Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2. The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
CVE-2025-0500 2026-04-15 7.5 High
An issue in the native clients for Amazon WorkSpaces (when running Amazon DCV protocol), Amazon AppStream 2.0, and Amazon DCV Clients may allow an attacker to access remote sessions via man-in-the-middle.
CVE-2025-8393 1 Dreametech 3 Dreamehome Android App, Dreamehome Ios App, Movahome Ios App 2026-04-15 7.3 High
A TLS vulnerability exists in the phone application used to manage a connected device. The phone application accepts self-signed certificates when establishing TLS communication which may result in man-in-the-middle attacks on untrusted networks. Captured communications may include user credentials and sensitive session tokens.
CVE-2025-65083 1 Tinexta Infocert 1 Gosign Desktop 2026-04-15 3.2 Low
GoSign Desktop through 2.4.1 disables TLS certificate validation when configured to use a proxy server. This can be problematic if the GoSign Desktop user selects an arbitrary proxy server without consideration of whether outbound HTTPS connections from the proxy server to Internet servers succeed even for untrusted or invalid server certificates. In this scenario (which is outside of the product's design objectives), integrity protection could be bypassed. In typical cases of a proxy server for outbound HTTPS traffic from an enterprise, those connections would not succeed. (Admittedly, the usual expectation is that a client application is configured to trust an enterprise CA and does not set SSL_VERIFY_NONE.) Also, it is of course unsafe to place ~/.gosign in the home directory of an untrusted user and then have other users execute downloaded files.
CVE-2024-48915 1 Astroxnetwork 1 Agent Dart 2026-04-15 N/A
Agent Dart is an agent library built for Internet Computer for Dart and Flutter apps. Prior to version 1.0.0-dev.29, certificate verification in `lib/agent/certificate.dart` does not occur properly. During the delegation verification in the `_checkDelegation` function, the canister_ranges aren't verified. The impact of not checking the canister_ranges is that a subnet can sign canister responses in behalf of another subnet. The certificate’s timestamp, i.e /time path, is also not verified, meaning that the certificate effectively has no expiration time. Version 1.0.0-dev.29 implements appropriate certificate verification.
CVE-2025-54470 1 Suse 1 Neuvector 2026-04-15 8.6 High
This vulnerability affects NeuVector deployments only when the Report anonymous cluster data option is enabled. When this option is enabled, NeuVector sends anonymous telemetry data to the telemetry server. In affected versions, NeuVector does not enforce TLS certificate verification when transmitting anonymous cluster data to the telemetry server. As a result, the communication channel is susceptible to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks, where an attacker could intercept or modify the transmitted data. Additionally, NeuVector loads the response of the telemetry server is loaded into memory without size limitation, which makes it vulnerable to a Denial of Service(DoS) attack
CVE-2024-4762 1 Lenovo 2 Accessories And Display Manager, Display Control Center 2026-04-15 7.8 High
An improper validation vulnerability was reported in the firmware update mechanism of LADM and LDCC that could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges.
CVE-2025-23118 2026-04-15 N/A
An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability could allow an authenticated malicious actor with access to UniFi Protect Cameras adjacent network to make unsupported changes to the camera system.
CVE-2024-43107 2026-04-15 7.2 High
Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in the Gallagher Milestone Integration Plugin (MIP) permits unauthenticated messages (e.g. alarm events) to be sent to the Plugin. This issue effects Gallagher MIPS Plugin v4.0 prior to v4.0.32, all versions of v3.0 and prior.