| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 EEC M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2IA M12 (6GK5788-2HY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0). This CVE refers to Scenario 2 "Abuse the queue for network disruptions" of CVE-2022-47522.
Affected devices can be tricked into enabling its power-saving mechanisms for a victim client. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to execute disconnection and denial-of-service attacks. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication (All versions < V5.30), SICORE Base system (All versions < V1.3.0). The web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in syngo.plaza VB30E (All versions < VB30E_HF05). The affected application do not properly sanitize input data before sending it to the SQL server. This could allow an attacker with access to the application could use this vulnerability to execute malicious SQL commands to compromise the whole database. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC ET 200AL IM 157-1 PN (6ES7157-1AB00-0AB0) (All versions), SIMATIC ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF (6ES7155-5AA00-0AC0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 MF HF (6ES7155-6MU00-0CN0) (All versions), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HA (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V1.3), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN R1 (6ES7155-6AU00-0HM0) (All versions < V6.0.1), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN/2 HF (6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN/3 HF (6ES7155-6AU30-0CN0) (All versions < V4.2.2), SIMATIC PN/MF Coupler (6ES7158-3MU10-0XA0) (All versions), SIMATIC PN/PN Coupler (6ES7158-3AD10-0XA0) (All versions < V6.0.0), SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF (6AG1155-5AA00-2AC0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF (6AG1155-5AA00-7AC0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF T1 RAIL (6AG2155-5AA00-1AC0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF (6AG1155-6AU01-2CN0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF (6AG1155-6AU01-7CN0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF T1 RAIL (6AG2155-6AU01-1CN0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF TX RAIL (6AG2155-6AU01-4CN0) (All versions >= V4.2.0), SIPLUS NET PN/PN Coupler (6AG2158-3AD10-4XA0) (All versions < V6.0.0). Affected devices do not properly handle S7 protocol session disconnect requests. When receiving a valid S7 protocol Disconnect Request (COTP DR TPDU) on TCP port 102, the devices enter an improper session state.
This could allow an attacker to cause the device to become unresponsive, leading to a denial-of-service condition that requires a power cycle to restore normal operation. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.9.0). The web server of the affected systems leaks the MACSEC key in clear text to a logged in user. An attacker with the credentials of a low privileged user could retrieve the MACSEC key and access (decrypt) the ethernet frames sent by authorized recipients. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication (All versions < V26.10), SICORE Base system (All versions < V26.10.0). The affected application contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XML inputs. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to exploit this issue by sending a malicious XML request, which may cause the service to crash, resulting in a denial-of-service condition. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication (All versions < V26.10), RTUM85 RTU Base (All versions < V26.10). The affected application contains denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability. The remote operation mode is susceptible to a resource exhaustion condition when subjected to a high volume of requests. Sending multiple requests can exhaust resources, preventing parameterization and requiring a reset or reboot to restore functionality. |
| An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel 5.8.9. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations reassemble fragments even though some of them were sent in plaintext. This vulnerability can be abused to inject packets and/or exfiltrate selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP data-confidentiality protocol is used. |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize an input field. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code or spawn a system root shell. Follow-up of CVE-2022-36323. |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize data introduced by an user when rendering the web interface. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code and lead to a DOM-based XSS. |
| Affected devices do not properly handle the renegotiation of SSL/TLS parameters. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass the TCP brute force prevention and lead to a denial of service condition for the duration of the attack. |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize an input field. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code or spawn a system root shell. |
| Affected devices do not properly authorize the change password function of the web interface.
This could allow low privileged users to escalate their privileges. |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations reassemble fragments with non-consecutive packet numbers. An adversary can abuse this to exfiltrate selected fragments. This vulnerability is exploitable when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP data-confidentiality protocol is used. Note that WEP is vulnerable to this attack by design. |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept second (or subsequent) broadcast fragments even when sent in plaintext and process them as full unfragmented frames. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets independent of the network configuration. |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext A-MSDU frames as long as the first 8 bytes correspond to a valid RFC1042 (i.e., LLC/SNAP) header for EAPOL. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets independent of the network configuration. |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 1030.36.604 for AWUS036ACH. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept fragmented plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The Wi-Fi implementation does not verify the Message Integrity Check (authenticity) of fragmented TKIP frames. An adversary can abuse this to inject and possibly decrypt packets in WPA or WPA2 networks that support the TKIP data-confidentiality protocol. |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. |
| The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802.11n), an adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets. |
